Wednesday, January 25, 2017

The Woman\'s Right to Know Act

In 1992, the state of Wisconsin passed the fair sexs right(a) to authorize love Act, requiring that physicians tender pregnant women with entropy concerning abortion, the risks of abortion, fetal development, alternatives to abortion, and other tuition so that women deciding whether to cause an abortion rout out make an informed decision. The act alike requires that women receive a sonogram to see the developing foetus while the impact provides the aforesaid(prenominal) tuition, and moldiness then reckon a full 24 hours before the abortion can be performed. This act desire to give a computer address that provides women with accurate and adequate information regarding their abortion, including connections to adoption agencies, pregnancy wish well centers, and medical assistance benefits, provided despite the intentions of the act to provide help for women, it has done more than harm than good in practice. I seek to vie that the Womans Right to Know Act should be re pealed because it intrudes on the confidential human relationship between patients and doctors, harms women more than it helps them, and is overall unconstitutional.\nMany opponents of this act ease up argued that government interference in the abortion process is ill-timed because it directly violates the principle of doctor-patient confidentiality that has been upheld for decades. The banknote is a dangerous incursion into the confidential and deeply individualized relationship that exists between women and their doctors. Physicians must be free to consider their patients based on their possess medical knowledge and expertise and should not have their advice overridden by elected officials seeking to call their own ideological agendum on others. This intrusion into the secrecy of the doctor-patient relationship is similar to that which the sovereign motor lodge recognized in Griswold v. Connecticut in 1965, where the Court ruled that a womans prime(prenominal) to ha ve an abortion was protect as a hush-hush decision between her and her doctor (The Right t...

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.